Research / Workforce


Policy Analysis | May 2021

Impact of the American Rescue Plan on Southern States

CSG Center of Innovation


Analysis of the American Rescue Plan: Fiscal Recovery Fund

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, signed into law on March 11, included $350 billion in new federal fiscal assistance for states, territories, tribes, counties and municipalities. An additional $10 billion is available to states, territories and tribal governments for critical capital projects that directly enable work, education and health monitoring in response to COVID-19. The Council of State Governments' Center of Innovation analyzed uses and restrictions for these funds and compiled total allocations for Southern states.

Read the Full Analysis

Analysis of the American Rescue Plan: K-12 Education Funding

The American Rescue Plan provides over $137 billion to early childhood and K-12 schools to reopen safely, make up for lost learning opportunities and address inequities made worse by the pandemic.

Read the Full Analysis

Analysis of the American Rescue Plan: Employers

Of the $1.9 trillion in funding in the American Rescue Plan, at least $62.4 billion is included to help private-sector employers stay in business, retain employees, provide sick leave and family medical care leave and respond more generally to the impact of COVID-19.

Read the Full Analysis

Analysis of the American Rescue Plan: Industries

More than $34 billion in funding from the American Rescue Plan is targeted at specific industries that were hit hardest by the pandemic including restaurants, entertainment venues and airlines.

Read the Full Analysis

Analysis of the American Rescue Plan: Workers

The American Rescue Plan affects employees in many ways, whether they are at work, become unemployed or want access to care and education for their children, housing, health care and more.

Read the Full Analysis

View the full program recording

Webinar | March 2021

Going the Distance II: Remote Work Implications for State Income Tax Collections

Cody Allen

As a consequence of the ongoing pandemic, many individuals and businesses have implemented short- and long-term shifts to teleworking. As nine states - including three in the South - do not levy individual income taxes, this work-from-home transition has led to a sizeable virtual workforce whose employers may be located in a state with a very different income tax structure than the one in which employees now reside and work. This program examines how this transition may impact state income tax collections and also explores the arguments over a state income tax collections case – New Hampshire v. Massachusetts – pending petition before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Presentations:

Richard Cram, Director, National Nexus Program Mutlistate Tax Commission, Washington, D.C.
Mobile Workforce Legislation: An Analysis by the Multistate Tax Commission


Policy Analysis | March 2021

Unemployment in the SLC Region Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Roger Moore

Disclaimer: On November 30, 2020, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the U.S. Department of Labor inaccurately reported the number of people filing for unemployment benefits during the pandemic. Due to the historic number of individuals filing for benefits beginning in March 2020, and states' frequent backlogs processing the claims, the traditional method of reporting unemployment did not accurately capture the number of unique individuals claiming benefits, according to the GAO report. For example, if a person filed for five weeks of benefits in a given week, the Department of Labor typically counted it as five separate claimants, not one. This method of reporting normally is a reliable proxy for the number of unique individuals claiming benefits, but it did not account for states' processing delays and claimants retroactively applying for benefits during the pandemic. While the absolute figures may not be accurate, the trend levels remain helpful for understanding the overall employment outlook.

This SLC Policy Analysis was concluded on March 26, 2021. For additional information regarding the Department of Labor data, please contact Roger Moore at rmoore@csg.org.

Continue Reading
2020-2021
Chair

Representative
Manly Barton

Mississippi

2020-2021
Vice Chair

Representative
Nathaniel Ledbetter

Alabama

Immediate
Past Chair

Representative
Jeanie Lauer

Missouri

Committee
Liaison
Roger Moore

Roger Moore
Senior Policy Analyst


The SLC Economic Development, Transportation & Cultural Affairs Committee examines issues related to infrastructure, transportation, economic progress and cultural strengths in the Southern region. Discussions and reports of the committee have focused on Southern state actions to bring manufacturing operations of national and foreign companies to the region, as well as the importance of ports, roads and railways for the movement of manufactured goods. The committee has a long history of studying the impact of the Panama Canal expansion and international trade with Mexico, Canada and China on Southern state economies.

More SLC Research on the Workforce


Policy Analysis | January 2020

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Other | January 2019

Issues to Watch - 2019

Policy Analysis | August 2018

Apprenticeships in the South

SLC Issue Brief | January 2018

The State of Retail in Southern States

SLC Regional Resource | June 2017

STEM Teacher Preparation and Retention in the South

Policy Analysis | October 2016

Employee Voting Leave Regulations

Policy Analysis | June 2016

Work Conditions for Mothers

SLC Regional Resource | July 2013

Workforce Development in the SLC States

Policy Analysis | March 2013

State Personal Income Trends

Policy Analysis | March 2012

Latest State Unemployment Rates

Policy Analysis | July 2011

Southern States' Annual Incomes Rates

Policy Analysis | June 2011

Manufacturing Jobs in the South

Policy Analysis | November 2010

Economic Impact of the Great Recession

Presentation | February 2010

State Unemployment Insurance: Recent Trends

SLC Special Series Report | July 2002

Unemployment Insurance In a Diminishing Economy