SLC 2021 Logo

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits

Attending substantive committee sessions of the SLC Annual Meeting may qualify for Continuing Legal Education credits in your state. Substantive committee sessions that may qualify for CLE credits are denoted in your Annual Meeting program with a superscript CLE following the title of the session. The total number of CLE hours available varies by state according to accreditation rules and the number of qualified sessions you attend.

To potentially qualify for CLE credit, you must:
  • Record your attendance at substantive policy sessions by checking in through the Annual Meeting app or signing the session's attendance list;
  • Arkansas only: complete and sign a Uniform Certificate of Attendance and email it to Mikko Lindberg (mlindberg@csg.org).
  • Complete and submit this online form; and
  • Provide payment for all fees associated with applying for CLE in your state (applies only to selected states and non-governmental attendees).
The status of CLE credits for substantive policy sessions is:
Alabama 15.0
Arkansas 15.0
Florida 15.0
Georgia 12.0
Kentucky Pending
Louisiana 11.5
Mississippi 15.0
Missouri 16.8
North Carolina 12.0
Oklahoma 18.0
South Carolina 12.5
Tennessee 14.0
Texas Pending
Virginia Pending
West Virginia 14.4

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credit Request Form


Please provide your name.
Please provide your state membership, registration or Supreme Court number *
Please select a state.
Please provide your phone number.
Please provide a valid email address.

* REQUIRED FIELDS


Policy sessions attended:

Saturday, July 10 | 11:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

Sunday, July 11 | 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.

Sunday, July 11 | 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.

Monday, July 12 | 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.

Monday, July 12 | noon - 1:30 p.m.

Monday, July 13 | 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.

Tuesday, July 14 | 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.



Program Evaluation (required)

Please rate the following on a scale of 1 (least) to 5 (most).

Facilities and Technology
Disagree Agree
1.The seminar room was conducive to learning the material presented.
2.The necessary technical, audio and visual elements were operational.
3.The presenters effectively utilized the technical, audio and visual elements.
Written Materials
Disagree Agree
4. The written materials effectively supplemented the program content.
5. The written materials will be useful in my legal practice.
Program Content
Disagree Agree
6. The length of the program was well-suited to the subject material.
7. The seminar covered the material I expected, given how it was advertised.
8. I gained knowledge that will be helpful in my legal practice.
9. Program leaders were receptive to participant questions and comments.
10. Program leaders fully answered questions from the program attendees.
Speakers and Presentation
Poor Excellent
11. Please rate the very best presenter you witnessed at the program.
12. Please rate the very worst presenter you witnessed at the program.
13. How do you rate the presenters' overall performance?
Overall
Poor Excellent
14. Please rate the overall quality of this program.

Comments (optional)

Please check the form and complete all required fields to continue.