MO2018 logo

72nd Annual Meeting of the
Southern Legislative Conference

St. Louis, Missouri
July 21-25, 2018

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits

Attending substantive committee sessions of the SLC Annual Meeting may qualify for Continuing Legal Education credits in your state. Substantive committee sessions that may qualify for CLE credits are denoted in your Annual Meeting program with a superscript CLE following the title of the session. The total number of CLE hours available varies by state according to accreditation rules and the number of qualified sessions you choose to attend.

To potentially qualify for CLE credit, you must:
  • Attend substantive policy sessions and sign both the CLE sign-in sheet and the committee session attendance sheet;
  • Complete the bottom section of a Uniform Certificate of Attendance form and deposit it into the CLE forms lockbox located at registration
  • Complete and submit this online form; and
  • Provide payment for all fees associated with applying for CLE in your state (applies only to selected states and non-governmental attendees).
The status of CLE credits for substantive policy sessions is:
Alabama 12.0
Arkansas 12.0
Florida 16.0
Georgia 12.0
Kentucky Pending
Louisiana 12.0
Mississippi 12.0
Missouri 10.0
North Carolina 12.0
Oklahoma 14.5
South Carolina 12.0
Tennessee 15.0
Texas 12.0
Virginia Pending
West Virginia 14.4

Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credit Request Form


Please provide your name.
Please provide your state membership, registration or Supreme Court number *
Please select a state.
Please provide your phone number.
Please provide a valid email address.

* REQUIRED FIELDS


Policy sessions attended:

Saturday, July 21 | 11:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

Sunday, July 22 | 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.

Sunday, July 22 | 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.

Monday, July 23 | 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.

Monday, July 23 | noon - 1:30 p.m.

Monday, July 23 | 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.

Tuesday, July 24 | 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.



Program Evaluation (required)

Please rate the following on a scale of 1 (least) to 5 (most).

Facilities and Technology
Disagree Agree
1.The seminar room was conducive to learning the material presented.
2.The necessary technical, audio and visual elements were operational.
3.The presenters effectively utilized the technical, audio and visual elements.
Written Materials
Disagree Agree
4. The written materials effectively supplemented the program content.
5. The written materials will be useful in my legal practice.
Program Content
Disagree Agree
6. The length of the program was well-suited to the subject material.
7. The seminar covered the material I expected, given how it was advertised.
8. I gained knowledge that will be helpful in my legal practice.
9. Program leaders were receptive to participant questions and comments.
10. Program leaders fully answered questions from the program attendees.
Speakers and Presentation
Poor Excellent
11. Please rate the very best presenter you witnessed at the program.
12. Please rate the very worst presenter you witnessed at the program.
13. How do you rate the presenters' overall performance?
Overall
Poor Excellent
14. Please rate the overall quality of this program.

Comments (optional)

Please check the form and complete all required fields to continue.